We are currently restructuring our databases, so be advised that the FCPAC database is updated only through July 30, 2025.

Processing your request


please wait...

Enforcement Action Dataset

 

Initiation Date:    09/28/2023  Information

Prosecuting Agency:    U.S. Department of Justice

Type of Action:    DOJ Criminal Proceeding

Docket or Case Number:    N/A

Court:    W.D. North Carolina

Name of Prosecuting Attorneys:   

  • Glenn S. Leon, Chief, Fraud Section, Criminal Division
  • Katherine A. Raut, Trial Attorney, Fraud Section, Criminal Division
  • Dena J. King, United States Attorney
  • Daniel Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney

US Assisting Agencies:   

  • Internal Revenue Service

Foreign Enforcement Action/Investigation:    Unknown

Foreign Assistance:   

  • Indonesian Law Enforcement Agency (ID)
  • Indian Law Enforcement Agency (IN)

Origin of the Proceeding:    Voluntary disclosure

Whistleblower:    Unknown

Case Status:    Resolved


Summary  Information

Albemarle Corporation, headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, was a specialty chemicals manufacturing company with operations in approximately 70 countries.The company was organized globally into three global business units: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. Albemarle’s subsidiaries were characterized as regional offices. The company’s shares were registered with the SEC and publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

According to the documents in this case, between 2009 and 2017, Albemarle, through its third-party sales agents and subsidiary employees, conspired to pay bribes to government officials to obtain and retain chemical catalyst business with state-owned oil refineries in Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. Albemarle obtained profits of approximately $98.5 million as a result of the scheme.

On September 28, 2023, the DOJ entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Albemarle. Under the terms of the settlement, Albemarle agreed to pay a criminal monetary penalty of $98,236,547 plus forfeiture of $98,511,669. However, the DOJ agreed to credit the $81,856,863 in disgorgement Albemarle paid to the SEC in its parallel enforcement action against the forfeiture, so the company would only pay $16,654,806 in forfeiture to the DOJ. The agency agreed to the non-prosecution agreement pursuant to its FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy because Albemarle voluntarily disclosed the misconduct, providing substantial cooperation to the department, and conducting extensive remediation. The DOJ did not give Albemarle full credit for its voluntary disclosure, however, because it determined that while the disclosure occurred prior to discovery of the misconduct by the department, it occurred many months after the company first learned about it and was thus not "reasonably prompt." Under the Corporate Enforcement Policy, however, Albemarle still qualified for a 45 percent reduction off the bottom of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range for its monetary penalty as well as an additional discount of $763,453 under the DOJ Pilot Program for bonuses withheld from employees who engaged in suspected wrongdoing.

In a related settled administrative proceeding initiated on September 29, 2023, the SEC ordered Albemarle to cease and desist violations of the antibribery, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the FCPA. Under the terms of the settlement, Albemarle agreed to pay disgorgement of $81,856,863 plus prejudgment interest of $21,761,447. The SEC imposed no civil monetary penalty in light of the $99 million criminal fine Albemarle agreed to pay in its parallel resolution with the DOJ. The SEC further noted Albemarle's voluntary disclosure, cooperation, and remediation.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.