| Groups of Related Enforcement Actions | Revenue from Bribes |
|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs' Involvement in Malaysia and the U.A.E. between 2009 and 2014 | $ 6,500,000,000 |
| TSKJ's Involvement in Nigeria from 1994 to 2004 | $ 6,000,000,000 |
| Hitachi's Involvement in South Africa between 2005 and 2014 | $ 5,600,000,000 |
| Alstom and Marubeni's Involvement in Multiple Countries from 2000 to 2010 | $ 4,000,000,000 |
| Societe Generale and Legg Mason's Involvement in Libya between 2004 and 2011 | $ 3,660,000,000 |
| SBM Offshore's Involvement in Multiple Countries | $ 2,819,500,000 |
| VimpelCom's Involvement in Uzbekistan between 2006 and 2012 | $ 2,500,000,000 |
| Telia's Involvement in Eurasia between 2007 and 2012 | $ 2,500,000,000 |
| Mobile Telesystems PJSC's Involvement in Uzbekistan between 2004 and 2012 | $ 2,400,000,000 |
| Former Bechtel Corporation Executive's Involvement in Egypt between 2003 and 2011 | $ 2,000,000,000 |
| Daimler's Involvement in Multiple Countries between 1998 and 2008 | $ 1,900,000,000 |
| Vantage Drilling's Involvement in Brazil | $ 1,800,000,000 |
| Credit Suisse's Involvement in Mozambique between 2013 and 2017 | $ 1,004,000,000 |
| Total's Involvement in Iran from 1995 to 2005 | $ 1,000,000,000 |
| Tenaris' Involvement in Brazil between 2008 and 2013 | $ 1,000,000,000 |
| Multiple Parties' Involvement in Venezuela between 2011 and 2020 | $ 1,000,000,000 |
| FTX Trading's Involvement in China between 2019 and 2022 | $ 1,000,000,000 |
| Alcatel's Involvement in Multiple Countries from 1999 to 2007 | $ 800,000,000 |
| International Systems & Controls' Involvement in Multiple Countries from 1970 to 1979 | $ 750,000,000 |
| Schnitzer Steel Industries' Involvement in China and South Korea in 1995 | $ 600,000,000 |
| Grupo DF's Involvement in India from 2006 to 2010 | $ 500,000,000 |
| Baker Hughes' Involvement in Multiple Countries from 1998 to 2005 | $ 468,533,895 |
| El Paso Corporation's Involvement in the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program between 2001 and 2002 | $ 420,000,000 |
| General Electric's Involvement in Israel in 1984 | $ 300,000,000 |
| Embraer's Involvement in the Dominican Republic, Mozambique, and Saudi Arabia from 2005 to 2011 | $ 254,400,000 |
| IBM's Involvement in Argentina in 1994 | $ 250,000,000 |
| ABB's Involvement in Nigeria, Angola, and Kazakhstan from 1998 to 2002 | $ 228,371,728 |
| Multiple Companies' Involvement in Mexico between 1977 and 1980 | $ 225,429,592 |
| Litton Industries' Involvement in Greece and Taiwan in 1993 | $ 197,000,000 |
| Amec Foster Wheeler's Involvement in the Middle East and Brazil between 2011 and 2014 | $ 190,000,000 |
For each revenue range represented on the navigation bar, this heat map identifies the number of groups of related Enforcement Actions filed since the statute's enactment that allege a dollar value for total revenue generated from the bribery that falls within that range. The navigation bar organizes the data by count and color, putting the revenue range with the most groups of related Enforcement Actions at the top in red, and the revenue range with the fewest groups of related Enforcement Actions on the bottom in yellow. Revenue values are culled from Enforcement Actions linked to FCPA Matters and are adjusted to avoid double counting that could otherwise occur when, for example, the same or affiliated defendants are sued in different Enforcement Actions for the same underlying misconduct. Revenue values referenced in FCPA-related Investigations are excluded from this analysis. Revenue that might have been earned from offers or promises to pay bribes that are not actually paid are excluded from the totals to the extent they can be segregated. Revenue totals include all revenue generated from completed bribery payments that allegedly violate any provision of the FCPA (including bribery payments that are made to private individuals in violation of the books and records or internal controls provisions of the FCPA). The data used to generate this graphic were culled from publicly available documents filed in connection with the Enforcement Actions, and may not reflect all bribery payments that were offered or made. "No revenue" means that no revenue was generated from bribery payments alleged in the Enforcement Actions. Enforcement Actions for which no total revenue value is disclosed are not included on the navigation bar, but are included in the list of Total Related Enforcement Actions. See About Us - Datasets for the definition of "Enforcement Action."