Groups of Related Enforcement Actions | Total Sanction |
---|---|
Ashland Oil's Involvement in Oman between 1980 and 1982 | $ 0 |
Harris Corporation's Involvement in Colombia in 1989 | $ 0 |
American Totalisator's Involvement in Greece in 1985 | $ 0 |
BJ Services's Involvement in Argentina from 1998 to 2002 | $ 0 |
Bristow Group's Involvement in Nigeria from 2003 to 2004 | $ 0 |
Lindsey Manufacturing's Involvement in Mexico in 2002 | $ 0 |
Oil States International's Involvement in Venezuela from 2003 to 2004 | $ 0 |
Baker Hughes and KPMG Siddharta Siddharta & Harsono's Involvement in Indonesia, India, and Brazil in 1999 | $ 0 |
Grupo DF's Involvement in India from 2006 to 2010 | $ 0 |
Katy Industries' Involvement in Indonesia between 1972 and 1978 | $ 0 |
Page Airways's Involvement in Multiple Countries between 1972 and 1978 | $ 0 |
International Systems & Controls' Involvement in Multiple Countries from 1970 to 1979 | $ 0 |
Tesoro Petroleum's Involvement in Unnamed Countries between 1968 and 1980 | $ 0 |
Holcar's Involvement in the United Arab Emirates from 1974 to 1978 | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in Bull Shoals, Arkansas | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Woodbridge, Virginia | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Sarasota, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in Sunrise, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in San Francisco, California | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in North Miami Beach, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in Decatur, Georgia | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Springfield, Massachusetts | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Aventura, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in Upper Darby, Pennsylvania | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in the United Kingdom | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in the United Kingdom | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in St. Petersburg, Florida | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving an Executive Employed by a Defense Contractor in Israel | $ 0 |
FBI Sting Involving Two Executives Employed by a Defense Contractor in Stearns, Kentucky | $ 0 |
For each monetary range represented on the navigation bar, this heat map identifies the number of groups of related Enforcement Actions filed since the statute's enactment for which the aggregate dollar value of sanctions imposed on all defendants to the Enforcement Actions falls within that range. The navigation bar organizes the data by count and color, putting the sanctions range with the most groups of related Enforcement Actions at the top in red, and the sanctions range with the fewest groups of related Enforcement Actions on the bottom in yellow. Sanctions are culled from Enforcement Actions linked to FCPA Matters and are adjusted to avoid double counting that could otherwise occur when, for example, sanctions are imposed jointly and severally on multiple defendants or a single sanction imposed on a parent entity is deemed to resolve claims against multiple different subsidiaries in multiple different Enforcement Actions. "No Sanction" means that no monetary sanctions were imposed on any defendant to any Enforcement Action. See About Us - Datasets for definitions of "Enforcement Action" and "FCPA Matter."